michel said to me perosnally at the event, and answered many questions directly, unfortunately many of his answers were not true specially in the way the software worked (context cash)

i spoke to a few others who bought into the offer and they have been ignored to.. so i suppose we all have to say $2000 lesson in not trusting what you are told no mater who is telling you

Cheers,
Jonathan

Thanks for stopping by the blog – I feel quite honoured actually.

Style of presentation is a very subjective experience. You’ll never be able to please everyone (unless you’re Morgan Westerman and give them all donuts). The first time I saw Stephen Pierce I found him too ‘in my face’ and actually arrogant which turned me off what he had to say. I know he’s a nice guy really but that’s not how he appeared. Now I know what to expect from him, I get a lot more out of his presentations.

What did I mean by “laid back”? Well, this was really a comment I got from a few people I spoke to and it reflects the way you got on stage and were able to just be yourselves, telling your story and what you were doing. You seemed fairly relaxed and nonchalant (and I mean that in a positive way). It wasn’t ‘punchy’ or ‘dramatic’ and you didn’t try to force your points across. It was all very natural. I guess some people may have found that a bit boring? Sorry.

In case you hadn’t realised though, I really liked your presentation so it worked for me. You did seem ‘real’ and gave a lot of genuine content. It didn’t feel like you were trying to pitch the whole time with a hidden (or not so hidden) agenda.

I was also one of the very few people in the room (as I mentioned in an earlier post) who actually got to hear the preview call you did with Ted Ciuba. So I knew what you were going to be talking about and was really looking forward to it. I was primed to listen and be interested.

Does that help? Probably not! It’s like saying that some people like chocolate ice cream and some people don’t.

Thanks for clarifying what you meant about harmonising and also setting me straight on the tattoo site. Coincidentally, about 2 minutes before seeing your comment, I was just watching one of the latest 30-Day Challenge videos where Ed Dale reminds us about the failure of Frank’s tattoo site and explains why. I’m still impressed that you and Sylvie managed to turn something like that into profit.

Best wishes Michel and thanks again for taking the time to comment.

Jonathan

P.S. Have a fantastic wedding – you and Sylvie seem great together!

For the record, the tattoo site is not Frank’s. But the concept is true — you can repurpose your content that doesn’t sell into monetisable website. Another great example is a book Sylvie has on Vegetarian Low Carb recipes (we thought would be a hit since most low-carb, high-protein diets are meat-driven). Sales are so-so but not extraorindary. But once we repurposed the content into a money magnet, we are making 10 times more with it than in its original ebook format.

Also, you say you weren’t sure about how to harmonise. The idea is, you link your money magnets with your sales sites strategically — either through our product ContextCash, or through backend offers to the list you built from the content site. And you generally offer people the ability to buy the same content, perhaps in a different format or for convenience sake.

Laslty, we’re not too sure by what you meant with “laid back” style. Many people who have approached us said they loved it since it made us look “real,” but that doesn’t take into account the people who didn’t approach us. Maybe you can elaborate? We really LOVE your feedback. It’s much appreciated and will help us serve our audiences better in the future.